Speed Test: Palm Pre vs iPhone 3G S vs iPhone 3G

By Taimur Asad | June 18th, 2009

CNET Asia has put together a video which demonstrates real world speed tests between Palm Pre, iPhone 3G S and its predecessor iPhone 3G. They carried out three tests in phase one which includes cold boot times, web browsing speeds and taking a picture and then sending it over air via email. Check out the video below to find out which phone came out on top?

DaVo

I’ve had the pre for over a week and have never seen it take more than 30 seconds to start up except right after the update. Also just how often do you really shut your phone completely down? Not sure if the test is needed. Though I’m really hoping this update that is supposed to come within a few weeks fixes the battery drain.
DaVo

I’ve had the pre for over a week and have never seen it take more than 30 seconds to start up except right after the update. Also just how often do you really shut your phone completely down? Not sure if the test is needed. Though I’m really hoping this update that is supposed to come within a few weeks fixes the battery drain.
DaVo

I’ve had the pre for over a week and have never seen it take more than 30 seconds to start up except right after the update. Also just how often do you really shut your phone completely down? Not sure if the test is needed. Though I’m really hoping this update that is supposed to come within a few weeks fixes the battery drain.
Pingback: Speed Test: Palm Pre vs iPhone 3G S vs iPhone 3G | Redmond Pie | TechnoSwarm.com()
Pingback: Speed Test: Palm Pre vs iPhone 3G S vs iPhone 3G | Redmond Pie « Get iPhone 3GS()
Pingback: Speed Test: Palm Pre vs iPhone 3G S vs iPhone 3G | Redmond Pie « Get iPhone 3GS()
Pingback: Rapidez a prueba en un Pre, iPhone 3G y 3G S | AlgoEstaPasando.com()
someone

i bought 2 days ago a samsung i200 and its just great. i thought it would be slow, but it runs really fast. a smartphone with windows mobile 6.1 is for me a better choice then iphone. now i can simply connect my phone to my pc and copy all my music on it in a couple of seconds without converting the mp3 files.
the startup time of palm pre is longer, but mostly the user turns it on once and then just recharges it before it turns off. and the applications are running faster then on the ipod and iphone. so for me palm pre is the better mobile device.
someone

i bought 2 days ago a samsung i200 and its just great. i thought it would be slow, but it runs really fast. a smartphone with windows mobile 6.1 is for me a better choice then iphone. now i can simply connect my phone to my pc and copy all my music on it in a couple of seconds without converting the mp3 files.
the startup time of palm pre is longer, but mostly the user turns it on once and then just recharges it before it turns off. and the applications are running faster then on the ipod and iphone. so for me palm pre is the better mobile device.
someone

i bought 2 days ago a samsung i200 and its just great. i thought it would be slow, but it runs really fast. a smartphone with windows mobile 6.1 is for me a better choice then iphone. now i can simply connect my phone to my pc and copy all my music on it in a couple of seconds without converting the mp3 files.
the startup time of palm pre is longer, but mostly the user turns it on once and then just recharges it before it turns off. and the applications are running faster then on the ipod and iphone. so for me palm pre is the better mobile device.