<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Semantic Web &#8211; Wakeup Call (Part 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmondpie.com/semantic-web-wakeup-call-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmondpie.com/semantic-web-wakeup-call-part-1/</link>
	<description>Covering Microsoft and its competitors like no one else!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:05:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: UzEE</title>
		<link>http://www.redmondpie.com/semantic-web-wakeup-call-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>UzEE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmondpie.com/?p=746#comment-482</guid>
		<description>This is really a point-to-ponder. Bringing the Web to the people is at full swing these days, But I believe that Semantic web is the better choice to achieve this.

If you look at its potential you would get the Idea, eg. Natural Language commands (like use gave above) will help an avg user; something that cant be achieved with Web 2.0.

On a good side, a couple of Projects have came up, like Ubiquity and Weave from Mozilla, and SemantiFind (which works on top of Google) are a few example.

But to exploit the full potential of Data Mining, and Grid Computing, the Web needs a lot More Standardization, than there is now. Also strong Privacy mechanisms have to be implemented that would insure that no personal or confidential information gets &quot;mined&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really a point-to-ponder. Bringing the Web to the people is at full swing these days, But I believe that Semantic web is the better choice to achieve this.</p>
<p>If you look at its potential you would get the Idea, eg. Natural Language commands (like use gave above) will help an avg user; something that cant be achieved with Web 2.0.</p>
<p>On a good side, a couple of Projects have came up, like Ubiquity and Weave from Mozilla, and SemantiFind (which works on top of Google) are a few example.</p>
<p>But to exploit the full potential of Data Mining, and Grid Computing, the Web needs a lot More Standardization, than there is now. Also strong Privacy mechanisms have to be implemented that would insure that no personal or confidential information gets &#8220;mined&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UzEE</title>
		<link>http://www.redmondpie.com/semantic-web-wakeup-call-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-79971</link>
		<dc:creator>UzEE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmondpie.com/?p=746#comment-79971</guid>
		<description>This is really a point-to-ponder. Bringing the Web to the people is at full swing these days, But I believe that Semantic web is the better choice to achieve this.

If you look at its potential you would get the Idea, eg. Natural Language commands (like use gave above) will help an avg user; something that cant be achieved with Web 2.0.

On a good side, a couple of Projects have came up, like Ubiquity and Weave from Mozilla, and SemantiFind (which works on top of Google) are a few example.

But to exploit the full potential of Data Mining, and Grid Computing, the Web needs a lot More Standardization, than there is now. Also strong Privacy mechanisms have to be implemented that would insure that no personal or confidential information gets &quot;mined&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really a point-to-ponder. Bringing the Web to the people is at full swing these days, But I believe that Semantic web is the better choice to achieve this.</p>
<p>If you look at its potential you would get the Idea, eg. Natural Language commands (like use gave above) will help an avg user; something that cant be achieved with Web 2.0.</p>
<p>On a good side, a couple of Projects have came up, like Ubiquity and Weave from Mozilla, and SemantiFind (which works on top of Google) are a few example.</p>
<p>But to exploit the full potential of Data Mining, and Grid Computing, the Web needs a lot More Standardization, than there is now. Also strong Privacy mechanisms have to be implemented that would insure that no personal or confidential information gets &#8220;mined&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UzEE</title>
		<link>http://www.redmondpie.com/semantic-web-wakeup-call-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-79972</link>
		<dc:creator>UzEE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmondpie.com/?p=746#comment-79972</guid>
		<description>This is really a point-to-ponder. Bringing the Web to the people is at full swing these days, But I believe that Semantic web is the better choice to achieve this.

If you look at its potential you would get the Idea, eg. Natural Language commands (like use gave above) will help an avg user; something that cant be achieved with Web 2.0.

On a good side, a couple of Projects have came up, like Ubiquity and Weave from Mozilla, and SemantiFind (which works on top of Google) are a few example.

But to exploit the full potential of Data Mining, and Grid Computing, the Web needs a lot More Standardization, than there is now. Also strong Privacy mechanisms have to be implemented that would insure that no personal or confidential information gets &quot;mined&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really a point-to-ponder. Bringing the Web to the people is at full swing these days, But I believe that Semantic web is the better choice to achieve this.</p>
<p>If you look at its potential you would get the Idea, eg. Natural Language commands (like use gave above) will help an avg user; something that cant be achieved with Web 2.0.</p>
<p>On a good side, a couple of Projects have came up, like Ubiquity and Weave from Mozilla, and SemantiFind (which works on top of Google) are a few example.</p>
<p>But to exploit the full potential of Data Mining, and Grid Computing, the Web needs a lot More Standardization, than there is now. Also strong Privacy mechanisms have to be implemented that would insure that no personal or confidential information gets &#8220;mined&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UzEE</title>
		<link>http://www.redmondpie.com/semantic-web-wakeup-call-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-79973</link>
		<dc:creator>UzEE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmondpie.com/?p=746#comment-79973</guid>
		<description>This is really a point-to-ponder. Bringing the Web to the people is at full swing these days, But I believe that Semantic web is the better choice to achieve this.

If you look at its potential you would get the Idea, eg. Natural Language commands (like use gave above) will help an avg user; something that cant be achieved with Web 2.0.

On a good side, a couple of Projects have came up, like Ubiquity and Weave from Mozilla, and SemantiFind (which works on top of Google) are a few example.

But to exploit the full potential of Data Mining, and Grid Computing, the Web needs a lot More Standardization, than there is now. Also strong Privacy mechanisms have to be implemented that would insure that no personal or confidential information gets &quot;mined&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really a point-to-ponder. Bringing the Web to the people is at full swing these days, But I believe that Semantic web is the better choice to achieve this.</p>
<p>If you look at its potential you would get the Idea, eg. Natural Language commands (like use gave above) will help an avg user; something that cant be achieved with Web 2.0.</p>
<p>On a good side, a couple of Projects have came up, like Ubiquity and Weave from Mozilla, and SemantiFind (which works on top of Google) are a few example.</p>
<p>But to exploit the full potential of Data Mining, and Grid Computing, the Web needs a lot More Standardization, than there is now. Also strong Privacy mechanisms have to be implemented that would insure that no personal or confidential information gets &#8220;mined&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UzEE</title>
		<link>http://www.redmondpie.com/semantic-web-wakeup-call-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-79974</link>
		<dc:creator>UzEE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmondpie.com/?p=746#comment-79974</guid>
		<description>This is really a point-to-ponder. Bringing the Web to the people is at full swing these days, But I believe that Semantic web is the better choice to achieve this.

If you look at its potential you would get the Idea, eg. Natural Language commands (like use gave above) will help an avg user; something that cant be achieved with Web 2.0.

On a good side, a couple of Projects have came up, like Ubiquity and Weave from Mozilla, and SemantiFind (which works on top of Google) are a few example.

But to exploit the full potential of Data Mining, and Grid Computing, the Web needs a lot More Standardization, than there is now. Also strong Privacy mechanisms have to be implemented that would insure that no personal or confidential information gets &quot;mined&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really a point-to-ponder. Bringing the Web to the people is at full swing these days, But I believe that Semantic web is the better choice to achieve this.</p>
<p>If you look at its potential you would get the Idea, eg. Natural Language commands (like use gave above) will help an avg user; something that cant be achieved with Web 2.0.</p>
<p>On a good side, a couple of Projects have came up, like Ubiquity and Weave from Mozilla, and SemantiFind (which works on top of Google) are a few example.</p>
<p>But to exploit the full potential of Data Mining, and Grid Computing, the Web needs a lot More Standardization, than there is now. Also strong Privacy mechanisms have to be implemented that would insure that no personal or confidential information gets &#8220;mined&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UzEE</title>
		<link>http://www.redmondpie.com/semantic-web-wakeup-call-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-79975</link>
		<dc:creator>UzEE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmondpie.com/?p=746#comment-79975</guid>
		<description>This is really a point-to-ponder. Bringing the Web to the people is at full swing these days, But I believe that Semantic web is the better choice to achieve this.

If you look at its potential you would get the Idea, eg. Natural Language commands (like use gave above) will help an avg user; something that cant be achieved with Web 2.0.

On a good side, a couple of Projects have came up, like Ubiquity and Weave from Mozilla, and SemantiFind (which works on top of Google) are a few example.

But to exploit the full potential of Data Mining, and Grid Computing, the Web needs a lot More Standardization, than there is now. Also strong Privacy mechanisms have to be implemented that would insure that no personal or confidential information gets &quot;mined&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really a point-to-ponder. Bringing the Web to the people is at full swing these days, But I believe that Semantic web is the better choice to achieve this.</p>
<p>If you look at its potential you would get the Idea, eg. Natural Language commands (like use gave above) will help an avg user; something that cant be achieved with Web 2.0.</p>
<p>On a good side, a couple of Projects have came up, like Ubiquity and Weave from Mozilla, and SemantiFind (which works on top of Google) are a few example.</p>
<p>But to exploit the full potential of Data Mining, and Grid Computing, the Web needs a lot More Standardization, than there is now. Also strong Privacy mechanisms have to be implemented that would insure that no personal or confidential information gets &#8220;mined&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UzEE</title>
		<link>http://www.redmondpie.com/semantic-web-wakeup-call-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-79976</link>
		<dc:creator>UzEE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmondpie.com/?p=746#comment-79976</guid>
		<description>This is really a point-to-ponder. Bringing the Web to the people is at full swing these days, But I believe that Semantic web is the better choice to achieve this.

If you look at its potential you would get the Idea, eg. Natural Language commands (like use gave above) will help an avg user; something that cant be achieved with Web 2.0.

On a good side, a couple of Projects have came up, like Ubiquity and Weave from Mozilla, and SemantiFind (which works on top of Google) are a few example.

But to exploit the full potential of Data Mining, and Grid Computing, the Web needs a lot More Standardization, than there is now. Also strong Privacy mechanisms have to be implemented that would insure that no personal or confidential information gets &quot;mined&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really a point-to-ponder. Bringing the Web to the people is at full swing these days, But I believe that Semantic web is the better choice to achieve this.</p>
<p>If you look at its potential you would get the Idea, eg. Natural Language commands (like use gave above) will help an avg user; something that cant be achieved with Web 2.0.</p>
<p>On a good side, a couple of Projects have came up, like Ubiquity and Weave from Mozilla, and SemantiFind (which works on top of Google) are a few example.</p>
<p>But to exploit the full potential of Data Mining, and Grid Computing, the Web needs a lot More Standardization, than there is now. Also strong Privacy mechanisms have to be implemented that would insure that no personal or confidential information gets &#8220;mined&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UzEE</title>
		<link>http://www.redmondpie.com/semantic-web-wakeup-call-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-79981</link>
		<dc:creator>UzEE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmondpie.com/?p=746#comment-79981</guid>
		<description>This is really a point-to-ponder. Bringing the Web to the people is at full swing these days, But I believe that Semantic web is the better choice to achieve this.

If you look at its potential you would get the Idea, eg. Natural Language commands (like use gave above) will help an avg user; something that cant be achieved with Web 2.0.

On a good side, a couple of Projects have came up, like Ubiquity and Weave from Mozilla, and SemantiFind (which works on top of Google) are a few example.

But to exploit the full potential of Data Mining, and Grid Computing, the Web needs a lot More Standardization, than there is now. Also strong Privacy mechanisms have to be implemented that would insure that no personal or confidential information gets &quot;mined&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really a point-to-ponder. Bringing the Web to the people is at full swing these days, But I believe that Semantic web is the better choice to achieve this.</p>
<p>If you look at its potential you would get the Idea, eg. Natural Language commands (like use gave above) will help an avg user; something that cant be achieved with Web 2.0.</p>
<p>On a good side, a couple of Projects have came up, like Ubiquity and Weave from Mozilla, and SemantiFind (which works on top of Google) are a few example.</p>
<p>But to exploit the full potential of Data Mining, and Grid Computing, the Web needs a lot More Standardization, than there is now. Also strong Privacy mechanisms have to be implemented that would insure that no personal or confidential information gets &#8220;mined&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

