<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best Free Antivirus and Antispyware for Windows 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redmondpie.com/best-free-antivirus-and-antispyware-for-windows-7-9140077/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redmondpie.com/best-free-antivirus-and-antispyware-for-windows-7-9140077/</link>
	<description>Covering Microsoft and its competitors like no one else!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:05:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abc</title>
		<link>http://www.redmondpie.com/best-free-antivirus-and-antispyware-for-windows-7-9140077/comment-page-1/#comment-68597</link>
		<dc:creator>Abc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmondpie.com/?p=6580#comment-68597</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but no...

Why was there a large number of virus&#039;s on Mac&#039;s running OS9 when their market share was way less than it is now?

Lev is correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but no&#8230;</p>
<p>Why was there a large number of virus&#8217;s on Mac&#8217;s running OS9 when their market share was way less than it is now?</p>
<p>Lev is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpaceOdyssey42</title>
		<link>http://www.redmondpie.com/best-free-antivirus-and-antispyware-for-windows-7-9140077/comment-page-1/#comment-56161</link>
		<dc:creator>SpaceOdyssey42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 03:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmondpie.com/?p=6580#comment-56161</guid>
		<description>Great article! Thanks! Very useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article! Thanks! Very useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.redmondpie.com/best-free-antivirus-and-antispyware-for-windows-7-9140077/comment-page-1/#comment-112353</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 08:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmondpie.com/?p=6580#comment-112353</guid>
		<description>exactly...macs don&#039;t have exe&#039;s and dll&#039;s...u cannot infect the system files because your account will be a local user account and the system files would need &quot;root&quot; level permission.Also AVG has issues with wireless broadband modems...they appranely block them from accessing the internet. (Case in POint: Reliance Netconnect used in India)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>exactly&#8230;macs don&#8217;t have exe&#8217;s and dll&#8217;s&#8230;u cannot infect the system files because your account will be a local user account and the system files would need &#8220;root&#8221; level permission.Also AVG has issues with wireless broadband modems&#8230;they appranely block them from accessing the internet. (Case in POint: Reliance Netconnect used in India)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nomorevilcorp</title>
		<link>http://www.redmondpie.com/best-free-antivirus-and-antispyware-for-windows-7-9140077/comment-page-1/#comment-49180</link>
		<dc:creator>Nomorevilcorp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmondpie.com/?p=6580#comment-49180</guid>
		<description>Do you work for Norton? In my humble opinion, Norton is the worst nightmare. I think is common knowledge that the best antivirus nowadays are the free antivirus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you work for Norton? In my humble opinion, Norton is the worst nightmare. I think is common knowledge that the best antivirus nowadays are the free antivirus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthijsen Serge</title>
		<link>http://www.redmondpie.com/best-free-antivirus-and-antispyware-for-windows-7-9140077/comment-page-1/#comment-41770</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthijsen Serge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmondpie.com/?p=6580#comment-41770</guid>
		<description>its just the problem with the freeware that he takes lots of space and makes the computer a little slower</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its just the problem with the freeware that he takes lots of space and makes the computer a little slower</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remove Spyware</title>
		<link>http://www.redmondpie.com/best-free-antivirus-and-antispyware-for-windows-7-9140077/comment-page-1/#comment-39711</link>
		<dc:creator>Remove Spyware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 20:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmondpie.com/?p=6580#comment-39711</guid>
		<description>You can also list avast:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can also list avast:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy32135</title>
		<link>http://www.redmondpie.com/best-free-antivirus-and-antispyware-for-windows-7-9140077/comment-page-1/#comment-23277</link>
		<dc:creator>andy32135</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmondpie.com/?p=6580#comment-23277</guid>
		<description>But it&#039;s not free...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But it&#39;s not free&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://www.redmondpie.com/best-free-antivirus-and-antispyware-for-windows-7-9140077/comment-page-1/#comment-17399</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmondpie.com/?p=6580#comment-17399</guid>
		<description>Uh, who recommends antivirus for Linux? All they&#039;re really good for is filtering out Windows viruses before they spread to another machine. They are useful on, for example, an email server, but no desktop Linux users run antivirus software.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The truth is, it&#039;s a little of both. Mac and Linux certainly do have vulnerabilities, but not nearly as many as Windows. The idea that Macs are simply not common enough to be worth exploiting is pretty thin at this point, since Mac OS X has gained quite a bit of market share. However, certainly more energy has been put into developing Windows viruses, so comparing the number of viruses on each platform isn&#039;t a great way to compare the inherent security of the OS.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s also worth mentioning that many security holes are found in third-party software which is shared across platforms, like Firefox, Adobe Reader and Java.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So far there have been zero instances of malware for OS X with the ability to propagate effectively, and every instance has required the user to explicitly enter their administrator password.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s certainly true that ANY platform can host a trojan horse, and this is NEVER going to change as long as it is possible to write programs for a platform. That much should be common sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, who recommends antivirus for Linux? All they&#39;re really good for is filtering out Windows viruses before they spread to another machine. They are useful on, for example, an email server, but no desktop Linux users run antivirus software.</p>
<p>The truth is, it&#39;s a little of both. Mac and Linux certainly do have vulnerabilities, but not nearly as many as Windows. The idea that Macs are simply not common enough to be worth exploiting is pretty thin at this point, since Mac OS X has gained quite a bit of market share. However, certainly more energy has been put into developing Windows viruses, so comparing the number of viruses on each platform isn&#39;t a great way to compare the inherent security of the OS.</p>
<p>It&#39;s also worth mentioning that many security holes are found in third-party software which is shared across platforms, like Firefox, Adobe Reader and Java.</p>
<p>So far there have been zero instances of malware for OS X with the ability to propagate effectively, and every instance has required the user to explicitly enter their administrator password.</p>
<p>It&#39;s certainly true that ANY platform can host a trojan horse, and this is NEVER going to change as long as it is possible to write programs for a platform. That much should be common sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://www.redmondpie.com/best-free-antivirus-and-antispyware-for-windows-7-9140077/comment-page-1/#comment-16025</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmondpie.com/?p=6580#comment-16025</guid>
		<description>Uh, who recommends antivirus for Linux? All they&#039;re really good for is filtering out Windows viruses before they spread to another machine. They are useful on, for example, an email server, but no desktop Linux users run antivirus software.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The truth is, it&#039;s a little of both. Mac and Linux certainly do have vulnerabilities, but not nearly as many as Windows. The idea that Macs are simply not common enough to be worth exploiting is pretty thin at this point, since Mac OS X has gained quite a bit of market share. However, certainly more energy has been put into developing Windows viruses, so comparing the number of viruses on each platform isn&#039;t a great way to compare the inherent security of the OS.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s also worth mentioning that many security holes are found in third-party software which is shared across platforms, like Firefox, Adobe Reader and Java.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So far there have been zero instances of malware for OS X with the ability to propagate effectively, and every instance has required the user to explicitly enter their administrator password.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s certainly true that ANY platform can host a trojan horse, and this is NEVER going to change as long as it is possible to write programs for a platform. That much should be common sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, who recommends antivirus for Linux? All they&#39;re really good for is filtering out Windows viruses before they spread to another machine. They are useful on, for example, an email server, but no desktop Linux users run antivirus software.</p>
<p>The truth is, it&#39;s a little of both. Mac and Linux certainly do have vulnerabilities, but not nearly as many as Windows. The idea that Macs are simply not common enough to be worth exploiting is pretty thin at this point, since Mac OS X has gained quite a bit of market share. However, certainly more energy has been put into developing Windows viruses, so comparing the number of viruses on each platform isn&#39;t a great way to compare the inherent security of the OS.</p>
<p>It&#39;s also worth mentioning that many security holes are found in third-party software which is shared across platforms, like Firefox, Adobe Reader and Java.</p>
<p>So far there have been zero instances of malware for OS X with the ability to propagate effectively, and every instance has required the user to explicitly enter their administrator password.</p>
<p>It&#39;s certainly true that ANY platform can host a trojan horse, and this is NEVER going to change as long as it is possible to write programs for a platform. That much should be common sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nitinmittal62</title>
		<link>http://www.redmondpie.com/best-free-antivirus-and-antispyware-for-windows-7-9140077/comment-page-1/#comment-13819</link>
		<dc:creator>nitinmittal62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 06:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redmondpie.com/?p=6580#comment-13819</guid>
		<description>i think norton antivirus 2010 is best for ur pc..coz it neither slow down d spped of pc nor works slowly...&lt;br&gt;it is best antivirus i ever seen for any operating system (windows7, vist, xp etc..)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think norton antivirus 2010 is best for ur pc..coz it neither slow down d spped of pc nor works slowly&#8230;<br />it is best antivirus i ever seen for any operating system (windows7, vist, xp etc..)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

