http://www.redmondpie.com/a-synctoy-for-the-cloud/ Covering Microsoft and its competitors like no one else! Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:05:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.redmondpie.com/a-synctoy-for-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-2066 Cory Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:45:39 +0000 http://www.redmondpie.com/a-synctoy-for-the-cloud/#comment-2066 I would like to understand how Live Mesh will be necessary once "Anchorage" is released. If I'm reading this correctly, Anchorage will sync across devices, computers, and web services. Live Mesh already accomplishes the first two, albeit a rough experience at the moment, so it sounds like I could use Anchorage and forget about Live Mesh. If so, why would MS continue to develop Live Mesh? I would like to understand how Live Mesh will be necessary once “Anchorage” is released. If I’m reading this correctly, Anchorage will sync across devices, computers, and web services. Live Mesh already accomplishes the first two, albeit a rough experience at the moment, so it sounds like I could use Anchorage and forget about Live Mesh. If so, why would MS continue to develop Live Mesh?

]]> http://www.redmondpie.com/a-synctoy-for-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-81049 Cory Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:45:00 +0000 http://www.redmondpie.com/a-synctoy-for-the-cloud/#comment-81049 I would like to understand how Live Mesh will be necessary once "Anchorage" is released. If I'm reading this correctly, Anchorage will sync across devices, computers, and web services. Live Mesh already accomplishes the first two, albeit a rough experience at the moment, so it sounds like I could use Anchorage and forget about Live Mesh. If so, why would MS continue to develop Live Mesh? I would like to understand how Live Mesh will be necessary once “Anchorage” is released. If I’m reading this correctly, Anchorage will sync across devices, computers, and web services. Live Mesh already accomplishes the first two, albeit a rough experience at the moment, so it sounds like I could use Anchorage and forget about Live Mesh. If so, why would MS continue to develop Live Mesh?

]]> http://www.redmondpie.com/a-synctoy-for-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-1738 Genbeta responde: ¿Cuál es la diferencia entre FolderShare y Live Mesh? | Planeta Tecnologia Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:24:17 +0000 http://www.redmondpie.com/a-synctoy-for-the-cloud/#comment-1738 [...] Live Services. Por ahora, tenemos algunos ejemplos del potencial de Mesh en esta área, tales como Anchorage, una evolución de SyncToy que ocupa el Live Framework para sincronizar datos de PC’s y [...] [...] Live Services. Por ahora, tenemos algunos ejemplos del potencial de Mesh en esta área, tales como Anchorage, una evolución de SyncToy que ocupa el Live Framework para sincronizar datos de PC’s y [...]

]]> http://www.redmondpie.com/a-synctoy-for-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-1655 The Synchronization Morass - Brownie Points Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:45:36 +0000 http://www.redmondpie.com/a-synctoy-for-the-cloud/#comment-1655 [...] that seemed oddly similar to Live Mesh. Codename "Anchorage", or as Redmond Pie calls it, "A SyncToy for the Cloud" If you're totally lost at this point, it's with good [...] [...] that seemed oddly similar to Live Mesh. Codename "Anchorage", or as Redmond Pie calls it, "A SyncToy for the Cloud" If you're totally lost at this point, it's with good [...]

]]> http://www.redmondpie.com/a-synctoy-for-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-1553 Erik Wynne Stepp Wed, 05 Nov 2008 01:15:08 +0000 http://www.redmondpie.com/a-synctoy-for-the-cloud/#comment-1553 This is interesting, but I'm wondering why "Anchorage"? Isn't this what Live Mesh is supposed to be for? This is interesting, but I’m wondering why “Anchorage”? Isn’t this what Live Mesh is supposed to be for?

]]> http://www.redmondpie.com/a-synctoy-for-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-81048 Erik Wynne Stepp Wed, 05 Nov 2008 01:15:00 +0000 http://www.redmondpie.com/a-synctoy-for-the-cloud/#comment-81048 This is interesting, but I'm wondering why "Anchorage"? Isn't this what Live Mesh is supposed to be for? This is interesting, but I’m wondering why “Anchorage”? Isn’t this what Live Mesh is supposed to be for?

]]>